Written comments and ratings, against your own criteria
Numbers alone hide the story, and prose alone is hard to compare. Lynxify.me combines both in one form: written answers to open questions, and scored ratings against the competencies your company defines. This is competency-based 360 feedback measured against your own standards, not a generic template, and because every rater answers the same questions on the same scale, the results stay comparable without flattening what people actually said.
Open written questions
Open-text prompts capture the context, examples and specifics that a score never will.
Ratings on a shared scale
Every rater scores the same criteria on the same scale, so results aggregate cleanly into one number per criterion.
Your own criteria
Define the competencies your company cares about, reuse them across rounds, turn them on or off as they change, and auto-add the core ones to every new round.
One form per rater
Written and rated questions live in a single focused form that takes a rater about fifteen minutes.
Never lose progress
Answers auto-save as a draft while raters type, so they can start, step away and finish later without losing anything.
Comparable across people
Company-level criteria mean two people reviewed months apart are still measured the same way.
When you set up a round, you pick the criteria from your company set, some of which can auto-add by default, and add any written prompts you want answered. Each invited rater gets one form combining both.
Raters answer on their own schedule, with progress auto-saved as a draft. As responses arrive, ratings aggregate per criterion while written answers stay attached in full, so the review conversation starts from evidence, the scores and the words together.
Run your first feedback round this week
Set up in minutes, completed without chasing, summarised automatically.