360-degree feedback,
built for small teams

You choose per round whether anonymous responses are allowed. When they are, each rater decides for their own answer whether to be named or anonymous. Either way the rules are shown to raters before they respond, and anonymous responses appear without a name and only within aggregated scores.

As many as you invite. A typical round gathers responses from four to ten colleagues, including peers, the manager and direct reports, all about the same person.

Yes. You define your competencies once at company level, break each into your own anchored questions, and reuse them across rounds, so scores stay comparable between people and over time.

Yes. Each round has a drag-and-drop questionnaire builder: add competencies, break each into rated and written questions with a short description of what a high rating means, add intro text, and choose the rating scale (frequency, agreement, proficiency or a plain 1 to 10). It is editable while the round is being set up and locked once it starts.

Yes. When a round finishes, an AI-generated summary of the ratings and comments is produced automatically, kept separate from the original responses and from the manager's private notes so nothing is overwritten.

With their existing Google or Microsoft account in one click, or through a secure email invitation if they use neither. There is no separate password for anyone to create or manage.

Teams of roughly 30 to 200 people. It is structured enough to run real reviews and light enough that nobody needs training to take part.

A few minutes per round: pick the person being reviewed, choose the raters, build the questionnaire from your criteria and set the timing. Each rater then needs around ten to fifteen minutes to respond.

Yes. Each person sets their own language, which applies across the interface and every system email, so a mixed-language team can take part without anyone switching languages. More languages are added over time.

One consolidated view per person: aggregated scores for each criterion with a per-question drill-down, every written response in full, and an automatically generated summary of the themes, ready to review, annotate and keep as the record for next review season.