360-degree feedback,
built for small teams

You choose per round whether anonymous responses are allowed. When they are, each rater decides for their own answer whether to be named or anonymous. Either way the rules are shown to raters before they respond, and anonymous responses appear without a name and only within aggregated scores.

As many as you invite. A typical round gathers responses from four to ten colleagues, including peers, the manager and direct reports, all about the same person.

Yes. Criteria are defined once at company level and reused across rounds, so scores stay comparable between people and over time.

Yes. When a round finishes, an AI-generated summary of the ratings and comments is produced automatically, kept separate from the original responses and from the manager's private notes so nothing is overwritten.

With their existing Google or Microsoft account in one click, or through a secure email invitation if they use neither. There is no separate password for anyone to create or manage.

Teams of roughly 30 to 200 people. It is structured enough to run real reviews and light enough that nobody needs training to take part.

Under five minutes per round: pick the person being reviewed, choose the raters, select criteria and set the timing. Each rater then needs about fifteen minutes to respond.

Yes. Each person sets their own language, which applies across the interface and every system email, so a mixed-language team can take part without anyone switching languages. More languages are added over time.

One consolidated view per person: aggregated scores for each criterion, every written response in full, and an automatically generated summary of the themes, ready to review, annotate and keep as the record for next review season.